Paper detail

Multi-Turn Agentic Scientific Literature Search via Workflow Induction

93/100ReadPublished 2026-07-01Fetched 2026-07-07Hit@5, MRR, controlled workflow corruptions, executable DAG, literature search agent, nDCG@10

Innovation Summary

Multi-Turn Agentic Scientific Literature Search via Workflow Induction: We introduce PaperPilot, a multi-turn literature search agent that frames scientific search as workflow induction.

Executive Summary

Multi-Turn Agentic Scientific Literature Search via Workflow Induction: We introduce PaperPilot, a multi-turn literature search agent that frames scientific search as workflow induction. Why it matters: Overall signal 93/100 driven by novelty 100 and practical impact 100. Primary categories: Hit@5, MRR, controlled workflow corruptions, executable DAG, literature search agent, nDCG@10. Community signal includes 7 upvote(s) and 1 comment(s), which helps separate durable interest from title-only curiosity. Implementation angle: Implementation potential scores 81/100; prioritize adaptation paths for internal agent, evaluation, or platform workflows. No linked repository is present, so expect more translation work before the ideas are production-ready. Technical depth scores 100/100, so a quick skim should focus on architecture, data, and evaluation sections before full adoption work. Caveat: No linked implementation is available yet, which raises integration cost and lowers reproducibility confidence.

Why It Matters

  • Overall signal 93/100 driven by novelty 100 and practical impact 100.
  • Primary categories: Hit@5, MRR, controlled workflow corruptions, executable DAG, literature search agent, nDCG@10.
  • Community signal includes 7 upvote(s) and 1 comment(s), which helps separate durable interest from title-only curiosity.

Implementation Angle

  • Implementation potential scores 81/100; prioritize adaptation paths for internal agent, evaluation, or platform workflows.
  • No linked repository is present, so expect more translation work before the ideas are production-ready.
  • Technical depth scores 100/100, so a quick skim should focus on architecture, data, and evaluation sections before full adoption work.

Caveat

No linked implementation is available yet, which raises integration cost and lowers reproducibility confidence.

Estimated Reading Priority

High - 93/100 signal; read before acting on adjacent agent, evaluation, inference, or ML systems work.

Observation History

Published 2026-07-01. First fetched 2026-07-07. Observed 2026-07-07.

Paper JSON record

Score Breakdown

Novelty
100
Practical Impact
100
Technical Depth
100
Implementation
81
Relevance
100
Community
58
Confidence
95